Author: Anonymous
1. Marriage is most certainly about raising children and has always been regarded as the predominant means of creating a conducive environment in which children can be brought up.
As gay couples are unlikely to have children, there
is no real necessity for the right to marry to be extended to them.
It is true
that many heterosexual marriages do not result in offspring, through choice or
infertility, however the male-female relationship preserves the general rule of
marriage: only between those with the potential for procreation. 'Children have
a valid claim to be raised by their own biological parents', to encourage
otherwise is to undermine long-held perceptions about the right way to bring up
our youth.
2. It is not discriminatory to refuse gay couples the right to marry, for marriage is an institution designed for the union of men and women alone. It is intrinsically about the ‘values that govern the transmission of human life to the next generation’; to deny gay couples the right to marry is merely, and obviously, to admit that they have no reproductive capacity.
2. It is not discriminatory to refuse gay couples the right to marry, for marriage is an institution designed for the union of men and women alone. It is intrinsically about the ‘values that govern the transmission of human life to the next generation’; to deny gay couples the right to marry is merely, and obviously, to admit that they have no reproductive capacity.

